Thanks for that Alan. Cheers,
Cotty >>I just plopped down 40 UK quid to a man I've never met for a 35mm f/2.8 - >>having done zero research first. Not my usual style, but needs must. A >>present for the S.O. as she expressed a great interest in David Mann's >>35mm f/3.5 and with all the chat recently about how their owners are >>optically retentive ;-) I thought I'd look out for a 2.8. I saw an f/2 go >>on eBay the other day for sixty-something pounds, so I figure 40 is okay >>for the 2.8?? Don't tell me it's a dog, please! > >I had the M, and then the A. There were some differences on the way their >glasses were treated, but both should have identical optical design. IMO, >they are good if not great optically. Just not razer sharp as prime lenses. _______________________________________________________ Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Check out the UK Macintosh ads http://www.macads.co.uk - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
