Both are very fine images, Paul! I think I prefer 1227, because the bark texture adds a lot to the overall image, to my eye, at least.
Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery <https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery>* On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 4:08 PM Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote: > Based on the time of year and the visual evidence, I would guess that this > female Cardinal is ready to lay eggs. > > I felt pretty good this afternoon, so I mounted the 150-450 on my K3, > which I’ve rarely used for the last few years. But it’s much lighter than > my K-1 plus battery pack, and eliminating the converter saved even more > weight and still gave me 675mm FOV. I didn’t dare trust my feet to take me > out in the yard to my customary spot, so I sat on a high kitchen chair on > the deck. Fortunately, this young lady perched relatively near. > > Handheld, f6.7, 1/1000th, 675mm fov > > https://www.photo.net/photo/18651227/Female-Cardinal > > https://www.photo.net/photo/18651226/Lady-Cardinal > > This has me thinking seriously about the K3-3 > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
