It wasn't shot at f/4 but it's an f/4 lens :) Thanks for the feedback, everyone. This was one of those situations where I thought I had it looking right but looked at it again the next day. I've set up my small light box but the slide does look a bit different. I might drag my bigger lightbox out to see whether that makes any difference.
Cheers, Dave > On Feb 24, 2022, at 10:50 PM, mike wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Difficult to be definitive from a tiny web image but that looks like huge DOF > for f4. >> On 24 February 2022 at 09:20 David Mann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> Recently I've been going through some old medium format film scans and >> processing the files to get them into my database. >> >> Here's one from 2001, I think it's from the first roll I put through the >> Pentax 6x7. It's a local landmark which I used to ride past on my way >> to/from university. >> >> http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1136/#peso >> >> Pentax 6x7 with 45mm f/4 >> >> The process is a bit painful; dust-spotting a 350+Mb file is not a lot of >> fun and I suspect the colours of the slides may have shifted a little over >> the past 20 years. I'm not great with colour-correction, and it doesn't help >> that I haven't calibrated my screen. >> >> It's just as well storage is plentiful... the image I used for the previous >> PUG was 1.45Gb as a PSD :) > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
