Why do you want to get rid of them? I kinda like'em. But, to answer your question - a polarizer shoud do the job quite well. It not only increases contrast, but can also decrease, and as we all know helps to get rid of reflections. Still, I guess you will be shooting in low light, and the polarizer usually requires an extra 1.5 stop of exposure. My two cents.
Regards, Lukasz -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Waterson Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 1:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: filter suggestions I wish to be able to eliminate some hot spots with some subjects under lights. I doubt I will totally get rid of the hot spots but I would like to get it down to a minimum. I have put an example at http://www.oceania.net/kevin/bb.php to see what I mean. This is taken with a MZ-30 with a 200mm. The hot spots on the leading edges, eg. calves, cheekbone, hip and elbow are most detracting. Please excuse the quality of the scan, it was scanned on a cheapy flat bed and not from a neg. Kind regards Kevin Kevin Waterson Byron Bay Australia - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
