I regularly use the FA 35/2 on the K-5 or K-70 when I prefer to have a compact set with me. I'm always happy with the results. Reading the positive test results from Yoshihiko Takinami on his website was the reason for me to buy this lens around the millennium change. Remarkably his website is still online without any changes: http://www.takinami.com/yoshihiko/photo/index.html
Henk Op zo 18 jun 2023 om 20:18 schreef Paul Stenquist <[email protected]>: > I have that lens but haven’t used it in years. I generally use the DFA > 24-70/2.8, an excellent lens. > > Paul > > > On Jun 18, 2023, at 10:24 AM, John Sessoms <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Ricoh does have the correct image on their site for a NEW lens: > > > > https://us.ricoh-imaging.com/product/smc-pentax-fa-35mm-f2-0-al/ > > > > It appears that just the refurbished lens has the wrong photo. > > > > Also, Juan Buhler: > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdbVcA5cTIs > > > >> On 6/16/2023 2:38 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > >> [email protected] wrote: > >>> > https://us.ricoh-imaging.com/product/smc-pentax-fa-35mm-f2-0-al-refurbished/ > >> For a moment I thought this was some kind of new, D-FA lens until I > >> realized they're simply referring to the old FA 35/2 and have the > >> wrong photo with it. (Perhaps they just use that as a generic photo > >> with certain postings?) > >> > > > > -- > > Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur > > > > -- > > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. > > www.avg.com > > -- > > -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
