I'd have to agree with Mike - the 889-pano is more pleasing to me than
NR-HDR-Pano. The milky way is better rendered and being able to better
see the horizon and landscape add to be overall image.
-p
89888-Enhanced-NR-HDR-Pano
On 2/16/2024 2:28 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I decided to have a go at another one of my photos, trying to take advantage of
new features in lightroom. It is an HDR panorama (at 15 and 20 seconds). For
the new version I did a lightroom noise reduction of each of the frames before
doing an HDR pano stitch.
I believe this is my previous version that I used for printing:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/30524911188/in/album-72177720314781277/
This one is my current "best try":
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/53532544424/in/album-72177720314781277/
I've learned a fair bit about using masks in the process.
All of my processing attempts over the years are in this album:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/albums/72177720314781277/with/42907311702
I would appreciate people's thoughts about what improvements the processing
might need. Is there anything about any of the older attempts that worked
better?
Thanks,
Larry
--
Larry Colen
l...@red4est.com. sent from Mirkwood
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email topdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
