I think the differences are pretty subtle. As I understand it the mk ii had lower noise at higher iso by doing some processing on the raw that reduces detail. It's supposed to have better focusing with longer lenses.
I think that the differences only matter in specific use cases On February 23, 2024 9:12:13 AM PST, John Sessoms <[email protected]> wrote: >What are the differences? > >-- >Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur > >-- >This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. >www.avg.com >-- >%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List >To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow >the directions. > -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
