I get the feeling that he only truly gushes when it is Minolta gear as that seems to be what he uses these days. But I do generally agree with your assessment.
Bruce Dayton Monday, June 24, 2002, 6:10:29 AM, you wrote: RBMB> That was also a long time ago when Keppler was using Olympus gear. Yes, every so often he complains about some features that have been dropped from SLRs, but now he mostly gushes over every RBMB> feature laden, fly weight entry level SLR. If you look at Photo Industry Reporter (http://www.photoreporter.com/2002/06-17/index.html) you'll see Keppler working the industry side of the RBMB> street. He may sell to the consumers, but I think that he views himself as part of the industry that he tries to help as much as possible. RBMB> From: Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RBMB> Bruce, I cannot argue with your statement for nowadays (since I RBMB> don't buy too many photo mags anymore), but, back in the 1970's and RBMB> through much of the 1980's, in the late-but-great Modern Photo RBMB> magazine, Keppler's column could almost always be relied upon for RBMB> good, solid photo information, including an interest in quality RBMB> photo gear and a general (although not universal) disdain for every RBMB> whiz-bang gadget to come down the photo 'pike. RBMB> Gee, that was a long sentence... RBMB> Fred RBMB> - RBMB> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, RBMB> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to RBMB> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
