Because on the K-1 it is unusually wide and fast. On mft it is just
unusually large.
I suppose you also object to other metricless ratings as "creamiest
bokeh", and "best UI"?
I can't measure why my 77 gives me such wonderful photos, that doesn't
mean that discussing it is nonsense.
On 2026-05-26 09:40, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Why? What makes that 11mm f/4 so cool on the K1 such that it isn't on
mFT? Is it cooler than the Voigtländer Heliar-HyperWide 10mm f/5.6
which even works on the Hasselblad 44x33 mm format (as well as on 35FF,
mFT, and APS-C formats)? The notion of a metric-less rating like
"coolness" is just literally non-sense.
G
—
No matter where you go, you aren't where you were.
On May 26, 2026, at 8:35 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Yeah, but an 11mm/4 that works on my k1 isn't nearly as cool on my
mft.
On May 26, 2026 2:48:59 AM PDT, Steve Cottrell <[email protected]>
wrote:
That’s an easy one to answer: anyone who shoots MFT, and for any sort
of photography.
I could ask anyone on this list if I could borrow their best lens,
and doubtless there will be an adapter for MFT - no fettling
involved.
Of course, whether or not you would trust me with your pride and joy
is entirely another matter ;-)
Cotty
On 25 May 2026, at 00:23, [email protected] wrote:
This brings up a couple of questions. Which mount has the the
coolest lenses available? But, then, for what sort of photography?
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
Larry Colen [email protected] http://red4est.com/lrc
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
