I seem to remember just this morning there was a thread on one of the Minolta scanners that was actually a 35mm scanner but could also do MF (at a reduced resolution).
Anyone got further info on this one? --BC On 26 Jun 2002 at 11:55, Bruce Dayton wrote: > Mark, > > Near as I can tell, JCO is having the best luck with his. His scans > are better than the ones I got. I returned mine, being unhappy with > the quality I was able to get out of it. Further reading on the web > indicates that there is a sample to sample variation - Quality Control > is not superb. I'm thinking that David Brooks also has one and he is > getting better scans than I did, but perhaps not quite as good as JCO. > One thing to keep in mind, there is not really any other option > besides a HUGE jump in price to get a regular film scanner for MF. If > you can try one and return it if not satisfied, it is probably worth > checking into. I'm almost tempted to try again and hope to get a > better sample. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
