Hi!

The following url tells how a matrix metering works but it is not quite 
clear to me. 

http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/matrix02.htm

Please note that the page will take sometime to load because it contains a 
jpg file of size 350KB.

I am quite sure that some of the list members must have electronics 
engineer as background. Could you please explain what that flow chart 
means?

Cheers,
Ayash.

On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Chris Brogden wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, P�l Jensen wrote:
> 
> > This is plain wrong. Evaluative meter is like any other meter; it
> > tries to make everything medium toned. However, the notion that center
> > weighed metering "solve" the problem or has a better "hit rate" is
> > plain wrong.  The fact that some people prefer center weighted
> > metering because they know how it react to various scenes is fine.
> 
> Agreed up to here.
> 
> > However, this has nothing to do with matrix metering failure but the
> > photographer not having learned how matrix metering works.
> 
> Uh... not exactly.  Photographers can never learn how multipattern
> metering systems work.  The algorithms are extremely complex; some Nikons,
> for example, have a database of tens of thousands of sample scenes that
> the camera will consider when choosing an exposure.  The photographer has
> no idea whatsoever which of these scenes the camera will select.  Matrix
> metering does a good job with print film for the most part, but the point
> is that the photographer, no matter how much they use it, will never be
> able to know for sure how much importance the meter is attaching to each
> individual segment in any given (and changing) lighting situation.  At
> least with CW metering you know exactly how much weight the camera gives
> to the segments.
> 
> I'm sure that, given enough time and experimentation, a photographer can
> learn how their camera weights the segments in some very common lighting
> conditions, but this is almost impossible to assess because of the sheer
> number of segments and variety of lighting conditions.  And it's only good
> until you switch cameras (most of the MZ series, for example, use
> different algorithms to decode the same six segments).
> 
> chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to