On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:02:33 +0800, Simon King wrote: >Glassless lenses also... >* Weigh less >* Don't have any spherical aberration >* Are shatterproof >* Are not susceptible to mildew > >:-) >Simon > > >-----Original Message----- >From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, 22 July 2002 8:58 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: What good is . . . > > >It would cut down on flare, too... <g> > >regards, >frank > >Simon King wrote: > >> I think it's a great idea to take the glass out of a lens. You don't want >to >> start wearing it out by mounting it on a camera now do you? >> It reminds me of the "Yes Minister" episode where they had the most >> efficient hospital in England because it didn't have any patients >> > >-- >"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist >fears it is true." -J. Robert >Oppenheimer >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . >
They do tend to dent more easily however. jm - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
