David, Boy I wish I could say more. I had one that I returned. But the reasoning had nothing to do with standard flatbed scanning. It was more an issue of scanning MF negatives and transparencies. I only scanned a couple of regular photos and to my recollection, it did a great job on those.
Bruce Monday, July 22, 2002, 11:54:25 PM, you wrote: DAM> Hi all, DAM> A colleague of mine is shopping for a new flatbed scanner. He's getting DAM> quite serious about photo restoration work and is looking for something DAM> better than his current scanner. DAM> He is currently interested in the Epson "2450 Photo" scanner. He already DAM> has the glossy marketing sheets but he's been looking for comments from DAM> people who have actually used one (an in-store demo is totally out of the DAM> question around here). He didn't find much on the web (dpreview, etc). DAM> He's only interested in scanning printed matter with this scanner. It DAM> comes with a transparency attachment but he won't use that, since he has DAM> an HP S20. DAM> If anyone on here owns this model scanner, or has used one, I'd DAM> appreciate your comments. Be as technical as you like, he knows how to DAM> tell his dpi from his ppi :) DAM> Cheers, DAM> - Dave DAM> http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ (out of date) DAM> - DAM> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, DAM> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to DAM> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
