Hi Chris!
Well - I have a somewhat similar inventory but my conclusions are developing to a 
different direction from yours.
I have slimmed my Pentax gear to MZ-S and ME with a selection of lenses. In addition I 
have a Leica M6 with 5 lenses (including 4.5/15 and 1.7/35 Voigtlanders - and the 
1.7/35 Voigtlander is noticeably sharper than the old version of 1.4/35 Summilux I 
had).
Now when I have owned the 3.5-4.5/24-90 IF & AL Pentax lens, I tend to use it and the 
MZ-S all the time and leave other gear home. I use the Leica very little and I am 
thinking about selling it (maybe not) or getting the much cheaper Voigtlander Bessa R. 
And I do miss the MZ-5n for its un-complexity but I do not miss my LX.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho

-----Alkuper�inen viesti-----
L�hett�j�: Chris Niesmertelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
P�iv�: 23. hein�kuuta 2002 1:07
Aihe: Pentax vs Voigtlander Bessa


>No, it's not a test between the two.  I've essentially whittled down my
>collection to 6 cameras, on the Pentax side the LX, ZX-5n, and an SV
>screwmount (additionally, a Chinon CE-4), and a Bessa R and L.
>
>I'd be interested in knowing if any of you in the PDML have a similar set up
>and how you feel about using your equipment.  I have to say, and I don't
>want to sound sacrilegious, but my CV equipment has been used far more
>regularly (save for a recent vacation to Nova Scotia - only Pentax equipment
>used).
>
>One area where there is, from my perspective, more opportunity for the
>Voigtlander is in people photography.  I took 4 rolls at a recent Jazz
>festival with the Bessa R and my subjects actually smiled at me, a far cry
>from the ZX-5n which I brought to a street fair a month or so ago and people
>where actually running to get out of view.  Of course, I went to Old Timer's
>day at Yankee Stadium, and the LX and 200mm M was the only choice to capture
>Reggie Jackson and his speech at his induction to Monument Park.
>
>I've been very impressed with the glass on the CV, owning the very nice 35mm
>f2.5 Classic, the great (TINY!) little 15mm and the 25mm I bought with the
>Bessa L.  I use a Russian 50mm that serves it's purpose, and a Russian 85mm
>that is more than serviceable.
>
>Obviously, there's no macro, depth of field, multiple exposure capabilities
>with the CV stuff, but the Bessas have increased the fun quotient and are
>much smaller.  The LX meter is something beyond the capabilities of most
>cameras ever made, but then I don't use the Bessas in the same way, when
>critical exposures are necessary.
>
>I guess for me I've found the perfect companion set up to the LX etc.  Both
>kits seem to complement each other, and there's sometimes clearly a "Bessa"
>opportunity and a "Pentax" opportunity.
>
>Best regards,
>Chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to