Hi Margo,
> A multiple exposure function would be nice!!! I suppose my main
> concern has to do with 'ruggedness": how much heat, cold or other
> environmental abuse a specific camera body could take. The "pro"
> models (such as the MS-Z) have more rugged bodies due to their
> construction. Or at least that's what the guy atr the camera store
> said. But I think he was trying to sell me an MZ-S!
It's very simple. MZ-3 costs, what, $400? The MZ-S costs $1000. Even
*_IF_* the MZ-3 fails some time along the road, you can get another one,
and still have $200 for a nice lens/flash/etc. Or, look at it this way,
maybe in 3-4 years you would be _happy_ if your MZ-3 breaks, and then
you say "Oh well, it was only $400", and then you buy the MZ-2 or
whatever camera is there to buy at that time. You would definitely not
give up the $1000 MZ-S easily.
Cheers,
Boz
--
_\\|//_ Imagination is more important than knowledge...
0(` O-O ')0 A. Einstein
===ooO=(_)=Ooo=======================================================
Bojidar D. Dimitrov author and editor, Pentax K-Mount web page
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kmp.BDimitrov.de/
=====================================================================
<__> <__>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
