For me,it's the 165/4 LS, not contest. Why? Simply because it allows the use of an umbrella and strobe for fill when shooting outdoor portraits or figures. It will do a head and shoulders portrait without an extension tube. I sometimes use the shortest tube for tightly cropped head shots. In 6x7 format, sharpness isn't really an issue. The 165/4 is certainly sharper than I need for most portrait situations. I frequently shoot through a piece of wedding vail lace when working with women. I haven't done enough work where bokeh is a factor to comment with certainty, but I haven't seen anything I don't like. Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, brothers > I would like to know what is the better portrait lens for the 67 in your > opinion. > It's including sharpness, handling, bokeh, min focus distance, ability to > do close headshots, etc, etc > All comments welcome. > Thanks in advance > > Albano > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
