Hi, On 15 Aug 2002 at 15:01, Peter Smekal wrote: > A few recommended a 35mm lense as an allround/workhorse lense - rather than > a 50mm as far I understood. I have no 35mm, but could of course try to get > one - in Sweden some 2.8's in good condition are not too difficult to find. > What is your experience. Would one lack the 50mm when taking a 24-35-85 > combo? And in what situations?
Last time I packed 24/2.8, 35/2 and 100/2.8. (A 85/2 could be a better choice, but unfortunately I haven't got one.) About 80% of the pictures were taken with the 35. I didn't lack my 50/1.4 a single time. A 35/2.8? Maybe I could do with it too. BUT: That extra stop seems to be important to have on a "normal" lens. Even F2 isn't too fast... Gabor - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
