I thought 105mm was part of the "classical" progression. At least for 35mm.
Len --- ----- Original Message ----- From: "andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 2:52 PM Subject: Re: must have primes? > >I'm a big fan of the 24/35/50/85/105 progression, but everyone has their > >own preferences. > >chris > > Chris, isn't the "classical" progression 24/35/50/85/135/200/300? > > Andre > -- > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
