Hopefully all the wedding guys work looks better than this one. I wasn't overly impressed. Very snap-shotty looking. I wonder if the smaller sensor leading to greater DOF has any negative impact on the images. I'm guessing that you would want to shoot a little more wide open to get rid of some of that snap shot look.
Bruce Sunday, August 18, 2002, 8:39:29 PM, you wrote: WR> ----- Original Message ----- WR> From: Tim S Kemp WR> Subject: Re: Next Pentax Flagship Camera? >> I would suggest though that wedding and portrait guys are not WR> yet dumping >> film. Not the ones I've seen anyway. I think 35mm is going WR> away in favour of >> digital though and all that holds it back is a sub �500 WR> digital body with a >> full frame CCD... WR> The new way of doing wedding photography: WR> http://trevorowen.com/paton/ WR> Shot on a Canon D60 WR> All the wedding guys around here have either gone digital, or WR> are doing so as soon as Canon builds enough D60's to supply the WR> market. WR> The fellow who shot the wedding noted above is trying to sell WR> his Pentax 6x7. WR> Why? WR> Because his D60 makes prints as good as what he can pull off the WR> 6x7 negative. WR> The moral? WR> Go digital, or go home. WR> Pentax had better figure this out, and soon. WR> William Robb WR> - WR> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, WR> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to WR> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
