Robert wrote: > Well, that's if a camera is primarily an object of contemplation or > perception, rather than something to be handled. Something ergonomically > designed for haptic interaction with the human body would ideally resemble > perhaps clay that is squeezed about and molded - or, indeed, something left > in the microwave. This perhaps isn't always the most beautiful thing to > look at, though to me the PZ-1p provides a certain vicarious haptic > satisfaction - and I find it handsome.
But the Z-1p's is quite difficult to hold. The MZ-S is far better in this regard; a view shared by the Popular Photography test link posted here recently. > Still, in the end, it is strange to be talking so much about camera looks > (though I admit from time to time I look at my PZ-1p and feel pleased to do > so). I believe the look of a product is of paramount importance for its sales. > Then again, aren't you the one who posted to the list that you can pay > x dollars to have a silver limited lens converted to black? What a strange > concept. Concept? P�l - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
