P�l Jensen wrote:
> 
= snipped =
 
> The Pentax 6-segment meter is among the best in business. I haven't 
> directly compared the Z-1p meter with the MZ-S. However, my impression 
> is that if you're using slide film the MZ-S meter is better. The Z-1p 
> meter seem slight more tuned towards overexposure whereas the MZ-S and 
> 645N meters almost never overexposes.

Can anyone lead me to the pattern the Spotmatic F meter covers?
This camera has a nice microprism spot (I sure wish it had a central
split!) and the area seems too small for a "center-weighted" meter
coverage. It's closer to what I imagine the Spotmatic 'spot' would
have covered initially...

Does anyone recall a drawing of the approximate coverage? I would like
to know how much area off dead-center the meter looks at, if for
nothing else than to judge how much to compensate.

Yes, I suppose I could make a big deal out of extensively testing it,
but it sure would save me a lot of time if someone actually knew!

Thanks,

keith whaley
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to