On 21 Aug 2002 at 19:38, Pieter Nagel wrote:

> On the other hand, one learns a lot by keeping the stinkers, looking at
> them in the calmness of your coffee table, and asking yourself "what did
> I do wrong here?"
> 
> Maybe that way one eventually tends to take less stinkers, which gives
> on the extra time to take two keepers in the time someone else would
> have deleted and re-taken one stinker?

Readily deletable stinkers to my mind are the images that you know full well 
are a waste of space, there seems to be an abundance of these to be found 
whilst shooting car racing i.e. plenty of car hoods and boots at the edge of 
the frame. In these types of situations digital shines and obviously there is 
very little advantage to consuming data space and transfer time by keeping such 
images.

Cheers,

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to