Which means that I can ac heave higher quality with my cheap film scanner and even cheaper HP Printer. This is very sad.
At 09:23 PM 8/27/2002 -0400, you wrote: > >But haven't we gotten used to a rather poor quality nowadays? I recently >looked at the B&W prints of my grandfather and I was amazed what quality >they had 50 years back. 4x6 inch prints where you would need to go really >close to see all detail. I think the present concept of 10 lines per mm for > >prints is really poor. I like holding pictures closer to see if there are >additional details and am often disappointed with the quality (especially >color) >< > >my Ritz Camera locally uses a scanner and digital laser processor. it >outputs ontp photographic paper at about 300 dpi. the dots are visible to >the naked eye. > >Herb....
