Bruce wrote: > I'm curious about the Agfa film. I have never shot the RSXII 50, but > have shot the RSXII 100. I did not see an obvious difference between > it and Provia 100F on my 67. Do you know if the 50 sucks but the 100 > is ok? The only Agfa film that I have been disappointed in is Afga > 160 Portrait. That film sucks - or my lab can't print it worth a darn > on Agfa equipment, paper and chemicals.
I've used the RSXII 100 in the 35mm format. I didn't find it particularly bad, quite good in fact. Perhaps a bit boring in flat light. The bad results with the RSXII 50 may be due to the processing. It is claimed that this film is very sensitive to processing variation. However, the Velvia rolls developed in the same batch are excellent. The laboratory is Kodak mail lab here in Norway. P�l
