The general feeling is that the original Tamron/Pentax were dogs. The later
Tamron is much better. I know little about the Sigma other than I would
never buy a Sigma consumer lens - which this is.

Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 12:26 PM
Subject: Pentax FA / Tamron vs Sigma 28-200's


> Hello out there in Pentax-Land.
>
> Does anyone have any experience with both of the following lens
> designs, and (if so) could compare them -
>
> The Pentax FA / Tamron 28-200/3.8-5.6 (I understand that these are
> the same lens)
>
> - versus -
>
> The Sigma 28-200/3.5-5.6
>
> Yes, I understand that these "do-everything" (<g>) lenses are
> chock-full of compromises, but nonetheless I am interested in their
> comparative optical and build qualities.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Fred
>
>

Reply via email to