Yeah - I have been thinking about the following combination: 2.8/20 Pentax F, 
2.8/24-70 Sigma and 2.8/105 Sigma macro. But the 3.5-4.5/24-90 Pentax is good.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho

-----Alkuper�inen viesti-----
L�hett�j�: Rob Brigham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
P�iv�: 10. syyskuuta 2002 17:44
Aihe: RE: ZX5-N Lens


>Yep, no doubts about the 24-90.  It may seem expensive for a lens with
>consumer zoom build quality - that's because ALL the money is spent on
>the optics.  It is fantastic.
>
>Only exception is if you want better build and/or faster aperture, you
>can get a 3rd party (Tokina/Sigma) pro build F2.8 lens for that money.
>The Pentax has the better optics though, and is much lighter...
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Raimo Korhonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>> Sent: 10 September 2002 17:19
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Vs: ZX5-N Lens
>> 
>> 
>> 3.5-4.5/24-90 Pentax (there is also a 24-135 Tamron - has 
>> anybody used it?). All the best! Raimo Personal photography 
>> homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
>> 
>> -----Alkuper�inen viesti-----
>> L�hett�j�: John Bevans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> P�iv�: 10. syyskuuta 2002 3:28
>> Aihe: ZX5-N Lens
>> 
>> 
>> >I have a new-to-me ZX-5N.  It came with  the Tamron 1:3.5 - 
>> 5.6 28-80 
>> >zoom. I have been reading the posts about the Sigma 28-135 and am 
>> >wondering if this is a
>> >superior lens to the Tamron.  I want to keep an AF zoom to 
>> go with some
>> >MF prime lenses.  I am mainly interested in the zoom lens for some
>> >action shots and family pictures.  I like the ZX-5N and 
>> would like the
>> >best zoom.  Any suggestions as to what I should be using?
>> >
>> 
>> 
>

Reply via email to