Christoffer wrote: > It's just slow torture compared with the revolutionary change of going > from FD to EOS...
Theres more to it than that. Having great backwards compatibility may be considered good when releasing new cameras. However, in the long run it erodes sales from newer cameras and lenses. Manufacturers build in obsolence in order to sell more products. A risky strategy but it may pay well off. > Nikon and Canon can not compete with Pentax on the basis of > comprehensive compatibility. The Pentax system can not compete with the > Nikon or Canon on the basis of comprehensiveness or ultimate technology. But the latter point has nothing to do with compatibility. P�l
