Brad Dobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heheh....I'm glad I'm not the only vain one! :) I have the older FA > 28-105mm 1:4-5.6 [IF]. I asked for comments on this before (mainly hoping > for someone to tell me it sucks so I could justify buying the 24-90mm) I > don't remember getting any. From my own limited experience it is a decent > lens. The new version with the AL elements is no doubt better, lighter, and > requires a smaller filter (dunno what size, but mine is 62mm)
Hi Brad, You made me recall a test in Spotmatic magazine: they compared the FA 28-105 (the powerzoom version) to the 24-90. The 24-90 wins hand down, especially wrt flare resistance and overall sharpness. I don't know if it is available on the AOHC website, though. Gianfranco ===== __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com
