Hi Rob, Did I really miss his point? Since I am giving my interpretation of his statement....
I think what he is saying, and Brad correct me if I am wrong, Nikon got its market share with a consistent marketing campaign directed at PJ & other pro's and as such has remained in peoples minds as that kind of product. So if Pentax could create the campaign for the MZS as the high end SLR most people feel it is, then shouldn't they? Or who is at fault for the kind of image that Pentax has. I don't personally feel let down by Pentax, I think its a study in market paradise, imagin without marketing the blooody thing they have sold it.I only found out about the MZS when I phoned the importers 2 months ago to find a PZ1. Would BMW bring out the new M3 CSL without a massive marketing drive, no they wouldn't and didn't. So maybe he is saying, I got the MZS, its good and please MR Pentax tell everyone. I got a review here in a mag called Practical Photography, they rated the MZS as on par with a F100 and 1% behind the EOS 3, whats one percent and the F100 is mostly just lighter and cheaper than a F5. SIZE!?!?, okay if ever I do a glamour shoot, I must remind myself to use the longest lens I got, even if it cause me to droop. <g> Feroze Where angels fear tread
