I hear you. The company I work for finally broke down and bought me a Canon G2 (they were having a little guilt trip over some of their past actions). It's a nice little camera, and works great for most things -- except sports. To get the most out of it, I'll have to get a flash for it. It's very gadgety, and I would definitely prefer more of an SLR interface. However, the time it has saved me having to have film processed, scanning, correcting and all that other fun pre-press stuff is immense.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:39 PM Subject: Re: Who here would really pay the price for a DSLR The bottom line is this. I > work for a paper. Whenever I don't have time for film > I have to shoot with my $150 Canon A10. That sucks. > Whenever I have to shoot something with film > (ie-sports), I have to spend an additional 3-4 hours > developing, scanning and working the photos. After > Friday night football, I don't get home till at least > midnight if not later. One of my stingers who owns a > D60 is in and out after the game in about 30 minutes. > Nick Wright > > >
