So sell some of the lenses and bodies. You can begin a slow exit from Pentax to the equipment you need for your business. Sell some on Friday.
Jim A. > From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:09:17 -0600 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Bedlam in Pentax Land: Might be fear and loathing of the lanuage > police. > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 19:02:24 -0400 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: P�l Jensen > Subject: Re: Bedlam in Pentax Land: Might be fear and loathing > of the lanuage police. > > >> I never seen anyone not being able to read such post or > flaming somebody for posting it. What I have seen are some > people complain about foul language. Personally I can't see what > good being rude and unpolite does except souring the atmosphere > and creating long bitter threads. By all means, if you prefer > people to call you names instead of arguing your points, say so! >> And why do you bother with a "pet camera company" thats unable > to deliver world class equipment, or a mailing list of the same? > Mind you, I'm not asking you to leave; I'm genuinely inrerested > in what kind of rationality lies behind this. > > No excuse for the foul language. I have tried to keep myself > above it for the past while, with some success. > Why do I bother with Pentax? > I like the lenses, and mostly, I like the equipment. Even the > MZ-S, as gimmicky as I find it, is more desirable to me than > anything else out there right now. > Regarding the mailing list, as you know, I don't find the > equipment to be very dependable. I have had far more camera > failures with Pentax over the past 15 years than I had with the > equipment I used for the previous 15 years. > This list has been a pretty good source of advice and > information in my attempts to keep my gear operating. >> >> >>> Some of us actually use this stuff for real work, not play >>> school photography. If we have strong opinions, there is a >>> reason for it. >> >> Why then bother yourself with second rate equipment if you > have a job to be done? > > Because I can't afford to replace the 30 or so lenses and dozen > bodies that I own. > When I bought the stuff, I thought it was first rate. By the > time I found out otherwise, I was in too deep to change. > > William Robb > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To > unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't > forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > > >> >> P�l >> >> >> > >
