On 13 Oct 2002 at 8:56, William Robb wrote: > If, and this is a big if, Pentax chooses to market a DSLR (and I > don't think they will), it will be based on the MZ-5 chassis, > and will not have pro specifications. > If that happens, there won't be any cheering from the peanut > gallery, there will be another collective bitch-out because once > again, Pentax didn't get it right, and has failed their customer > base.
Maybe you are correct about the "pro" spec, but really who gives a sh*t we don't have a choice, anything is better than what we've got to choose from thus far. If it's reliable but not as robust as an LX then I just won't do a tv on it :-) > I liked this list a lot more when it was about film and > photography. I thought I had useful stuff to contribute back > then. I'm the last person on the list that would claim that what you have to offer is not extremely useful and appreciated however things have changed in photography and the scope of comment has to include such changes. It's still the same old soap-box :-) Respectfully, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
