I must say your theory makes more sense. I'm just getting silly it's time to go to bed.
At 03:08 PM 10/14/2002 +1000, you wrote: >Yeah, a monut is similar in principle to a monopod. > >Shaun Canning >PhD Student >Department of Archaeology >School of European and Historical Studies >La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic, 3086. > >Phone: 0414-967644 >e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >-----Original Message----- >From: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, 14 October 2002 2:55 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Digital! I got digital! Long but worth actually reading! > >I was just wondering if Pentax had a new product what by the way is a monut, >something like a donut? > >At 12:43 AM 10/14/2002 -0400, you wrote: > >Hey Peter, > > > >Heh...well, speeling isn't my strongest area. I tend to find in my emails > >(I always seem to read them over and over) that I make stupid errors like > >'one' coming out as 'on' or like just now 'as' coming out as 'at', and >other > >odd crap. I think my brain is just running faster than my fingers.... In > >serious work, my grammar is quite excellent. What did I spell incorrectly > >btw? I just scanned it over and didn't see anything jump out at me. > >Remember, we Canucks have a different version of English than Americans. > > > >Brad Dobo > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Peter Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 11:51 PM > >Subject: Re: Digital! I got digital! Long but worth actually reading! > > > > > > > I think I should apologize to Aaron for damaging the Brotherhood Ninjas > > > before I > > > returned them, those Pentax agents really could use some lessons in > >subtlety. > > > (and just as an aside, Brad could use a spell checker, like I should > >talk). > > > > > > At 06:17 PM 10/13/2002 -0400, you wrote: > > > >Hahaha...you guys are are a hoot! This is a great place, but I think >we > >all > > > >get a little too carried away with things. :) Speaking of.... > > > > > > > >Some guy smoking a cigarette and in a black trenchcoat approached me >and > > > >told me that a *real* Pentax DSLR full frame, 15MP, K monut kicks the > ^^^^^ > >crap > > > >out of anything on the current market has been made, but it is in Area > >51, > > > >apparently it was found in an alien spacecraft that crashed in Roswell > >New > > > >Mexico in the 1940s. He suggested that I should look into it, as the > >truth > > > >is out there. > > > > > > > >As for my termination, I have recently gone to Nikon Protection >Services > > > >Bureau to seek aid in providing me with a new identity. > > > > > > > >Brad Dobo > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "Pentax Research and Destroy Branch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 4:35 PM > > > >Subject: Re: Digital! I got digital! Long but worth actually reading! > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Brad Dobo wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > And come on guys, you want Pentax to know what you think? Write a > > > > > > letter addressed to their main headquarters. Write a lot, >everyone > > > > > > write one, start a petition list. Don't believe that Pentax spies > > > > > > watch this mailing list. You really look foolish went you write > >that > > > > > > you do. > > > > > > > > > > YOU HAVE BEEN MARKED FOR TERMINATION, AS PER PENTAX MARKET RESEARCH > > > > > DIVISION BYLAW PRS-M-3700 SUBSECTION L PARAGRAPH 3. HAVE A NICE >DAY. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
