On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote: > The FA 100/3.5 it is! I don't have any true macro lenses, and it can't > feel any worse than a Nikon AF50/1.8.
That's what you think. It ranks right up there with Canon's EF 50/1.8, only worse, since it's a zoom. chris
