Wierd, that was the missing message I was refering to, I must sleep!
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brad Dobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 11:30 AM Subject: Re: Canon and long lenses > I did not realize I was conducting a statistical sample :) > > Still cannot discount it. > > I need sleep. > > Brad > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bruce Rubenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 11:19 AM > Subject: Re: Canon and long lenses > > > > Your sampling size (number of camera stores: 2) is throwing things off. > > Brand preference often has a local component to it. Try looking for long > > lenses on sale on e-bay, you will see many more long Nikon lenses. Canon's > 8 > > year AF performance advantage helped sell a lot of long lenses to > > sport/wildlife shooters. Nikon sales were helped by their jump on Canon in > > DSLRs. As to who makes the "best", this is something that arm chair > > hobbiests worry about. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Brad Dobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > > > > >
