I'll second this comment....... In the absence of a continuos flow of product or product flow from Pentax, a stream of informal clues add an important demension to the list---IMHO.
Otis Bruce Dayton wrote: > I, for one, am glad that P�l passes on what he hears/finds. Whether > they materialize or not, if gives me something to look into and check > out that I might otherwise totally miss. > > A big thanks from me! > > Bruce > > Thursday, October 17, 2002, 8:50:02 AM, you wrote: > > PJ> Dave wrote: > > >> I like what I've heard - but as I'm with Bruce on this one. It's been > >> touted by us here and on that JIJ website and on DCresource but it's still > >> rumor until Pentax makes it "official" (at which time of course that will > >> confirm or renounce Paal's ability at prognostication) :) > > PJ> I don't find this discussion very interesting. I just like to point out that I'm >not prognosticating anything but simply pass on information. If this information is >correct or incorrect it's not > PJ> really up to me. The information is there and everyone is free to do whatever >they want with it. > > PJ> P�l
