I know I'm preaching to the converted here, but I thought I'd post the
results from some scans I did today.
http://www.beard-redfern.com/scantest/index.htm
By the way, the scan of the print is pretty much true to life. That's the
sort of quality I'm getting back from the photo lab. Why they can't get it
right with equipment costing thousands of dollars and I can get results 10
times better with a film scanner costing $500CDN, I don't know. The three
scans are unmanipulated, they are just as they came out of the scanner.
Contrast, colour and sharpness haven't been altered.
Now if only it wasn't so tedious scanning negatives..................
Wendy Beard,
Ottawa, Canada
http://www.beard-redfern.com
- Re: A good argument for buying a film scanner wendy beard
- Re: A good argument for buying a film scanner Jeff
- Re: A good argument for buying a film scanner Dan Scott
- Re[2]: A good argument for buying a film scanner Bruce Dayton
- Re: A good argument for buying a film scanner Herb Chong
- Strange "Pentax" posting arkibladt
- Re: Strange "Pentax" posting Brad Dobo
- Re: A good argument for buying a film scanner Dan Scott
- Re: A good argument for buying a film scanner William Robb
- Re: A good argument for buying a film scanner Herb Chong
- Re: A good argument for buying a film scanner Paul Stenquist

