On 26 Oct 2002 at 23:53, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: > Rob Brigham wrote: > > >Come on guys, it even has the same lens mounted that it was shown 2 > >years ago with at the show! These are old images! The whole article is > >conjecture. > > This is not the same lens. The one 2 years ago was FA 35/2 - here we have > probably FA 50/1.4.
I even have several pics of it in my archives with a 24-90 mounted, so the pics aren't the same. This doesn't mean however that they aren't just recycled pics, it's so easy to back pedal. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
