Hey Bruce, Couple of things. One, you said it was 4th among the big 3....is it a misinterpretation or are you saying Pentax isn't even in the 'class' that Minolta is?
Assuming you mean it's 4th in the big 4, in NA, how did you come to this? Is it profits per year or something? If so, that's one way to judge them, but I personally like judging them on a bunch of factors. To others that read and responded. I didn't choose Pentax for ranking. But I like to feel some pride in saying 'Hey, we're the best at this' type of thing. Bragging rights, etc. Am I being to shallow? :) One might argue that since we chose Pentax and continue to support them by spending $$$, then one might tell us to say, 'We're #1!!' ;-) Brad Dobo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 11:04 AM Subject: RE: rec.photo.equipment.35mm > In NA Pentax is 4th among the big 3. > > BR > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brad Dobo [mailto:brad.dobo@;rogers.com] > > I knew Pentax wasn't top dog, but I thought number 4 out of the big four > wasn't so bad. Is Pentax on the way out, or is the sales guy just a > yo-yo? >
