> Nothing in the text mentions the lens hood. Are you sure what's
> pictured is an RH-A77?

You're right, Bob - I am not sure.  I just made the assumption that
it is the RH-A77 - it looks (as much as can be judged in the photo)
as if it's the RH-A77 - that is, it looks just as useless as the
RH-A77 - <g>.  The RH-A77 is simply too wide and too shallow to
really provide full flare protection (not that the 135/1.8 needs all
that much help in the flare department).  Someone here on the PDML, I
think, uses a Heliopan or a Nikon hood instead.

Fred


Reply via email to