To put in my 2cents befor leaving(i said -500 midnight:)
I have run 5-6 rolls of Kodak 400cn na d alththoug �you can see in
the neg it is not 'true'b&W film, i hav ebeen very happy with the
results.However now that i have joined the "brotherhood of dark":)
i'll stick with Tmax 100 or Delta 100.:)
Dave
---- Begin Original Message ----
From: "Bill D. Casselberry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 12:35:17 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Chromogenic B&W
Mark Roberts wrote:
> ... so I tried out a roll of Kodak T400CN ... It does indeed seem
> to be much more scanner friendly than the traditional stuff. My
> question is: Can anyone tell me how the Ilford chromogenic films
> compare to the Kodak stuff?
I have used all of them except the new Portra B&W and found
the TMax400CN to be the best - IMHO, of course. Wheatfield
reports that the Ilford is much more suscepible to physical
damage due to its "softness", not a good thing if getting
moderate cost processing.
Bill
� � � �---------------------------------------------------------
� � � �Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �[EMAIL PROTECTED]
� � � �---------------------------------------------------------
---- End Original Message ----
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/
http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
