I've found the A45/2.8 to be very good, in regards to sharpness and lack of distortion.. Although i dont think its quite as sharp as the FA75/2.8. I've never tried the FA45/2.8 so cant comment on it.
Most of my shots with A45/2.8 have been up close, i've only shot it as infinity a couple of times. Regards, Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 3:56 PM Subject: RE: 645N film flatnes problems > > -----Original Message----- > > From: P�l Jensen [mailto:paaljensen@;sensewave.com] > > > > > > Tom wrote: > > > > > The 33-55 I tried didn't seem all that sharp either, > > certainly not as > > > sharp as the 120 or 45-85. > > > > It certainly isn't as sharp as the 120mm but what is? > > The 45-85. > > > > Than again, you're shooting at infinity, I'm at 3-10 > > feet, so we might > > > both be right. > > > > > > Well I do shoot a various distances and if anything the > > zoom is sharper in close close area. Not at least due to > > the fact that the plane of focus with this lens is a sphere! > > Say again? You're saying the zoom has a flatter plane of focus than > the 45? > > Does anyone know if the 45 had it's optics changed when they upgraded > it from A to FA? Anyone with an A 45 care to commment? > > tv > > >
