On 2 Nov 2002 at 11:02, Robert Soames Wetmore wrote:

> Why is the 57mm normal a thing of the past?  Does anyone know?  All fast 
> normals now seem to be 50mm on the nose, whereas once so many were 57mm.  I
> rather like the 57mm focal length, and it makes a nice compliment with a 40mm
> (also not so popular any more).  I once recall someone (maybe Mike Johnston -
> I'm not sure) posting about how it was easier, or once easier, to make fast 57mm
> lenses as compared to fast 50's.  (I may have gotten that all wrong.  I've gotta
> get more organized about saving and cataloguing old posts.)

Hi Rob,

I expect (like Mike) that normal lenses around 50mm were easier to fabricate as 
a fast prime in the past, I suspect that this would be the case since they are 
near symmetrical in their AOV and AOP (angle of projection).

It appears that fixed lens cameras have migrated from 50-55mm down to 35-38mm 
over the last 30 years. Maybe this was a function of advances in lens 
fabrication technology or maybe the fact that a slightly wide lens may lends 
its self to a wider array of general subjects?

In any case wide lenses now offer high image quality and high speed and now 
satisfy my preference for a "standard" lens, the Pentax 31mm LTD being my first 
choice.

> To keep this on topic, I was thinking about doing a shoot out between my 
> Hexanon 57mm f/1.2 (for Konica Autoreflex) and the Pentax SMCP-A 50mm f/1.2. 
>   I have a feeling the Hexanon is superior but would be interested to test the
> performance differences.  Would anyone be interested in the results?

It would be an interesting test however I would advise not just considering 
resolution but also the chromatic distortion and flare/contrast between the 
pair. I have a Minolta 58mm f1.2 and whilst it's a nice piece of glass I don't 
believe that it holds up against my Pentax 50mm f1.2 lenses however I've not 
ever executed a side by side comparison.

Cheers,

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html

Reply via email to