On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 02:53 PM, Pentax Guy wrote:
So, basically, as I see it, 'bokeh' does not exist. Therefore the speakingNonsense? Brad, you might as well say "because I have never seen 'X', 'X' does not exist. Therefore the speaking or writing of it is nonsense." Actually, I've never seen you documented in print...hmm...
of it or writing of it is nonsense. But I still say, someone prove me
wrong. Give me hard proof (again, no math required), and I will start
analysing the 'bokeh' of photographic prints.
;-)
Dan Scott.

