On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 02:53  PM, Pentax Guy wrote:

So, basically, as I see it, 'bokeh' does not exist. Therefore the speaking
of it or writing of it is nonsense. But I still say, someone prove me
wrong. Give me hard proof (again, no math required), and I will start
analysing the 'bokeh' of photographic prints.

Nonsense? Brad, you might as well say "because I have never seen 'X', 'X' does not exist. Therefore the speaking or writing of it is nonsense." Actually, I've never seen you documented in print...hmm...

;-)

Dan Scott.



Reply via email to