Fred,

In all of these site cites, my browser says, "Netscape is unable to
locate the server."
None of them will open for me. Has anyone else reported that problem?

Wait a minute...I find that if I change the backslashes to forward
slashes, it works! Hah!

Thanks,

keith whaley

Steve Larson wrote:
> 
> Fred,
>  Thanks for all the data!
> Steve Larson
> Redondo Beach, California

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:42 AM
> Subject: VS1 35-85/2.8 Lens Images
> 
> > Prompted by a recent thread involving the Vivitar Series 1 35-85/2.8
> > lens and its modification for newer K-mount bodies, I'm providing
> > some images involving this lens:
> >
> > Here are two VS1 35-85/2.8's, the left one of which shows the extra
> > baffle, while the right one has been modified:
> > <http://www.cetussoft.com\pentax\v358528\1ofeach.jpg";>
> >
> > It is important, of course, to mask off completely the rest of the
> > lens when the extra baffle is being removed:
> > <http://www.cetussoft.com\pentax\v358528\lensmod.jpg";>
> >
> > It is also possible to remove the K-mount flange and then remove the
> > extra baffle after masking off only the flange:
> > <http://www.cetussoft.com\pentax\v358528\flangmod.jpg";>
> >
> > A description of the VS1 35-85/2.8 in a 1976 Vivitar Series 1
> > brochure:
> > <http://www.cetussoft.com\pentax\v358528\brchdscr.jpg";>
> >
> > Specifications for and a photo of the VS1 35-85/2.8 in the same
> > Vivitar Series 1 brochure::
> > <http://www.cetussoft.com\pentax\v358528\brchspcs.jpg";>
> >
> > An ad for the VS1 35-85/2.8 from 1975:
> > <http://www.cetussoft.com\pentax\v358528\ad7510mp.jpg";>
> >
> > An ad for the VS1 35-85/2.8 from 1976:
> > <http://www.cetussoft.com\pentax\v358528\ad7607po.jpg";>
> >
> > An ad for the VS1 35-85/2.8 from 1979:
> > <http://www.cetussoft.com\pentax\v358528\ad7904mp.jpg";>
> >
> > Another ad for the VS1 35-85/2.8 from 1979:
> > <http://www.cetussoft.com\pentax\v358528\ad7907mp.jpg";>
> >
> > Fred
> >
> >

Reply via email to