P�l wrote: PJ> The question is whether or not the MZ-5n/3 has played out it's PJ> role. There's not much you can do with the MZ-5n/3 and still keep PJ> it simple. You can of course update the AF but you cannot have PJ> several AF points without redesigning or complicate the user PJ> interface. I feel that the MZ-S really is the updated MZ-5n/3.
MZ-5n was intended to rescue old timers and it may have ended its mission indeed. The question is, is there a retro trend out there to justify Pentax to upgrade it? If not, what will they do for the 5n followers besides offering a very expensive upgrade path to the MZ-S? Servus, Alin
