Heh...your quote shows the limitations of a spell checker! <g>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "CBWaters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: OT: My spelling sucks


> What about "my spelling in perpetually, woefully inadequate."
> Cory Waters
> the preceding was brought to you by the Microsoft spell checker.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "wendy beard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 11:38 PM
> Subject: Re: OT: My spelling sucks
> 
> 
> > Not very inventive, eh, Frank ;-)
> > 
> > How about
> > "My spelling is worse than that of 18 one-armed monkeys composing 
> > Shakespeare on typewriters with no qwertyuiop"
> > 
> > Or something.....
> > 
> > At 10:52 PM 19/11/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> > >Apparently, that's okay...  <g>
> > >
> > >Brad Dobo wrote:
> > >
> > > > Fine, I'll change my wording, my spelling blows! <g>
> > > >
> > 
> > Wendy Beard,
> > Ottawa, Canada
> > http://www.beard-redfern.com
> > 
> > 
> 

Reply via email to