Tom, So far, I have only printed a few 4X6 prints. I mostly have been comparing on screen.
I am talking about 35mm as the Minolta will only scan 35mm. To date, I have been somewhat disappionted with scanning slides on the Minolta. That is what prompted me to try this out. I'll try printing an 8X10 from both scanners and let you know what I think. Bruce Wednesday, November 20, 2002, 11:28:51 AM, you wrote: t> Are you making prints? t> Are you talking about 35mm or just 67? t> -- t> Thomas Van Veen Photography t> www.bigdayphoto.com t> 301-758-3085 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:08 PM >> To: PDML >> Subject: Epson 2450 results >> >> >> Just for those who are wondering, >> >> I have been doing some comparative scans of slides with my >> Epson 2450 >> and Minolta Dimage Scan Dual II. What I am finding is that >> the Epson >> is delivering a more usable scan. Basically I think that >> the diffused >> light source in the lid is hiding more scratches/dust and the >> resultant scan is smoother - less grainy looking. Both >> deliver about >> 2400 dpi resolution. The scan software that is working >> best for this >> operation is the supplied Silverfast product. I haven't tried >> comparing negatives yet. >> >> Any questions, let me know. >> >> >> Bruce >>
