For P�l, there is only one correct way to do anything, and that is his way. Anything else is foolish, or even moronic. Not to say that there aren't a lot of highly opinionated people here. I'm also one of them. I, however, won't call anyone a fool because of their preferences. It is, after all, the pictures that count and, if you are happy with your pictures, your methods are obviously right for you.
Len --- > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Walkden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 1:56 PM > To: William Robb > Subject: Re[2]: Depth of Field Preview (was: Re: Why I won't > be buying an MZ-S) > > > Hi, > > one of the few things I occasionally miss when I'm using > rangefinder cameras is the dof preview. It does give a > reasonable approximation and sometimes that's all that's > necessary. Trying to figure it out from the scale is often > not very convenient. > > Incidentally, I don't know how Pal's statement "I can't > imagine anyone claiming to be remotely professional who don't > use DOF preview" quite squares with all those professional > (well, paid anyway) photographers working for Magnum etc. who > use Leica Ms! <g> > > --- > > Bob > > Sunday, November 24, 2002, 7:53:58 PM, you wrote: > > > Won't get one from me. All my lenses have a distance scale. > Even with > > the 4x5 groundglass, estimating DOF on the screen can be difficult. > >
