Hi Bruce,
What about optical performance?Which of 24, 35 and 50 is the best/worst?
I own A50/1.7 so it should be roughly similar to FA version.
Alek
Użytkownik Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>Ryan,
>
>As one who has owned both the FA 28/2.8 and FA 35/2, I don't think it
>is that important to own both. The 31 splits the focal lengths and is
>reputed to be quite a wonderful lens. It also partially depends on if
>you own or intend to get the 43 limited. The FA 35/2 is not too far
>from the 43 in focal length. The 31 & 43 make a better set.
>
>As for me, I sold my FA 28/2.8. I have the FA *24/2 and the FA 35/2
>and the FA 50/1.7. That makes a very nice set also.
>
>
>Bruce
>
>
>
>Sunday, December 1, 2002, 9:58:41 PM, you wrote:
>
>RC> Hello to All,
>
>RC> If you had the choice of either the Pentax 31mm f1.8
>RC> Limited lens or both the FA 28mm f2.8 and FA 35mm f2,
>RC> what would you choose?
>RC> Please only responses from those who know these lenses
>RC> well.
>
>RC> Thanks,
>RC> Ryan
>
>RC> __________________________________________________
>RC> Do you Yahoo!?
>RC> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
>RC> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
>
